Advertisement
MDchoice.com
We subscribe to the HONcode principles
of the Health On the Net Foundation


Health Information
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Find more information about this topic from either the Web or the world's best medical journals by using the search boxes at the top of this page.
 


Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies


  Purpose

Background

Description

Results

Purpose

To determine whether histocompatibility matching of corneal transplant donors and recipients can reduce the incidence of graft rejection in high-risk patients.

Background

Approximately 20 percent of corneal transplant patients, about 6,000 per year, face donor tissue rejection at rates of up to 60 percent because of corneal vascularization or prior graft rejection. Histocompatibility antigen matching and/or crossmatching may have offered these patients an improved chance for successful outcome.

Description

  The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Group conducted two controlled, double-masked studies addressing distinct scientific questions about donor-recipient histocompatibility matching. The Crossmatch Study was a randomized study assessing the effectiveness of crossmatching in preventing graft rejection among high-risk patients with lymphocytotoxic antibodies. The Antigen Matching Study was a prospective, double-masked, observational study of the effectiveness of HLA-A, -B, and -DR donor-recipient matching in high-risk patients who had no lymphocytotoxic antibodies.

Six clinical centers recruited high-risk patients and collaborated with their local eye banking and organ procurement agencies in procuring donor corneal tissue. For each of the two studies, a total of 400 patients were sought. Blood samples from each enrolled patient were sent to the local CCTS tissue typing laboratory for HLA typing, and serum samples were sent to the Central Laboratory to be screened for preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies. Depending on the results of the testing, patients were entered into the Crossmatch Study or the Antigen Matching Study.

As corneal donors became available, donor blood samples were HLA typed at the local laboratories and crossmatched against all CCTS patients who awaited transplantation. Results of the testing were entered in a national, 24-hour computerized allocation system operated by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Patients in the Crossmatch Study received a cornea from either a positively crossmatched donor or a negatively crossmatched donor. Patients in the Antigen Matching Study received a cornea with 0 to 6 matched antigens.

Transplant patients were followed intensively during the first months after surgery. The number of clinic visits was tapered to 2 during the third and final year of followup, resulting in a total of 17 postoperative visits. Irreversible failure of the corneal allograft due to all causes was the primary outcome variable in both studies. Allograft reaction episodes, irreversible failure due to rejection, and visual acuity were secondary outcome variables.

Results

Researchers report that donor-recipient tissue typing had no significant long-term effect on the success of corneal transplantation in more than 400 patients at high risk for rejection.

The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies (CCTS) suggested instead that matching patient and donor blood types (ABO compatibility), a test that is not currently standard practice in corneal transplantation, might be effective in improving patient outcome. Treating patients with high-dose topical steroid therapy for several months after surgery may have improved transplant survival in this study.

After 3 years of patient followup, CCTS researchers found that people who received corneal transplants with well-matched antigens did not fare significantly better than those with a poor match. Each patient group had similar rates of initial immune reactions, graft rejection, and graft failure due to rejection or other causes. The researchers also noted that CCTS patients who were compatible with the donor’s blood type had a better outcome than unmatched patients.

The CCTS also reported a 65 percent rate of graft survival at its 3-year mark--higher than the usual average of about 50 percent in high-risk patients. The study’s high success rate might be due to rigorous high-dose steroid therapy given to control the patients’ immune reaction to the donor cornea several months after surgery.

The most important conclusion to be drawn from the CCTS is that high-dose, postoperative topical steroids, good patient compliance with a self-administered steroid regimen, and close patient followup are the keys to successful corneal transplantation in high-risk individuals.

Data from the CCTS indicate that matching patient and donor blood types combined with treating patients with high-dose topical steroids after surgery may be potentially more effective in improving high-risk corneal transplantation. These two inexpensive strategies are considerably more economical than the more expensive donor-recipient tissue typing. These findings provide clinicians with solid information on managing patients at high-risk for graft failure, while keeping health care costs to a minimum.


Last Updated: 10/21/99